Comments

From Here to Eternity (1953) — 6 Comments

  1. It is fun to have family tie-ins, for sure. Prewitt was, of them all, true to his own code of ethics. Sometimes that is a very hard thing to do.
    Donna Reed’s finale speech confused me. Why did she have to make up that story? Just saying he died would have been enough. She did not appear to be a fanciful person at all.
    AND, which way did the leis flow? It is a choose your own ending type of tale!

  2. There are definitely “leaps of logic.” It was daring in its day, but feels more like an army-base soap opera now. A really GOOD one, however!

  3. This is a good objective review untinged by your family connection 😉 It’s a good film, especially considering its source is a novel that truly could seem unfilmable. In the novel, Maylon Stark was a much bigger character, but his part was largely left out which was a huge blow to George Reeves, who was desperate to break out of his Superman typecasting. Some speculate it might be what led to his possible suicide. I have some quibbles with the film primarily because I am an unobjectively slobbering devotee of the novel. One, which I have (mostly) come to terms with is the casting of Sinatra as Maggio. But James Jones was very pleased with this, and this is his baby and who am I to argue?

    • It’s hard to enjoy a film when you’ve embraced the source material so passionately. I try to think of book/film or play/film as two separate entities. The key question I ask is, “Does it work on its own terms?” In its own medium? “Cabaret” is a great example of performing a total overhaul on the original stage musical, yet having the screen adaptation work brilliantly. So much was changed! Being objective isn’t easy, right? I’m glad you appreciate this movie for what it is, and I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts!

  4. I love the film! I maybe didn’t come across as if I do. Overall it does an excellent job of capturing the essence of the novel. And yes, it does work on its own terms. I will say that one huge change does affect the general takeaway. That is that in the movie, Dana Holmes gets in trouble for his behavior but in the novel he gets a promotion. IIRC it was because the Army didn’t like that message.
    Another aspect I like here is the director is Fred Zinneman – who directed Day of the Jackal – another great movie I love based on a book I love.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>